IMPACT OF LATE PAYMENT TO MSME VENDORS -

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SECTION 43B(h) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961

Introduction

The Government vide Finance Act, 2023 introduced clause 'h' to section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Ac') to the statute books with an intent to protect the interest and mitigate the hardships of the micro and small size enterprises (MSE) from default in payment of their dues. The insertion of newly inserted clause 'h' to section 43B of the Act would mean that the deduction with respect to any sum payable by the Assessee to any MSE beyond the time limit specified in section 15 of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSME Act) would be allowed only on payment basis.

Therefore, understanding of the definition of MSE, provisions of section 43B(h) under various scenarios that may call for disallowance, and provisions of section 15 of the MSME Act therefore acquire relevance for a better understanding of the tax consequences

Who qualify to be a micro or a small enterprise?

Notification no. S.O. 2119 (E) dated 26.06.2020 , section 2(h) and 2(m) r.w. section 7 of the MSME Act prescribes the following criteria for micro or small enterprise which must be cumulatively satisfied -

Sr. No Condition/ criteria Micro enterprise Small enterprise
1 Investment in P&M (good) or equipment (services) Upto Rs. 1 crore above Rs. 1 crore
upto Rs. 10 crore
AND
2 Turnover Upto 5 crore Above Rs. 5 crore
upto Rs. 50 crore

It is clarified by Explanation 1 to the 7(1) of MSME Act that in calculating the investment in plant and machinery, the cost of pollution control, research and development, industrial safety devices and such other items as may be specified, by notification, shall be excluded.

Apart from the above, the enterprise meeting such criteria must have obtained an Udyam registration from a competent authority under the provisions of section 2(n) r.w.s 8 of the MSME Act to be eligible for recognition as a MSE.

Therefore, in absence of such registration, applicability of provisions of section 43B(h) may not arise to payments due to such vendors.

  1. https://incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx
  2. https://dcmsme.gov.in/State-Gov/Notification_%20S%20O%202119.pdf
Position of payment made to medium enterprises

Your attention may be invited that the word 'medium enterprise is missing' from the provisions of section 43B(h) and section 15, therefore suggesting that sums payable to medium enterprises do not get covered under the sweep of section 43B(h) of the Act.

Position of payment made to pure traders

Furthermore, section 2(e) of the MSME Act defines an enterprise to be industrial undertaking or business or any other mode of establishment which is engaged in the manufacture or production of goods pertaining to industry mentioned in the First Schedule of the Industries development and regulations Act, 1951 or engaged in providing or rendering of any services.

Further, The Central Government , vide office memorandum(O.M) issued on 2-7-2021 , has allowed the TRADERS to get registration for UDYAM under the NIC Code 45,46 and 47 but for limited purposes. In that O. M. it is specifically stated that benefit to retail and wholesale trader MSME shall be restricted only for Priority Sector Lending.

Accordingly, one may consider that payment made to pure traders of goods do not get covered by the provisions of section 43B(h) of the Act though they would have acquired a UDYAM registration for banking purposes.

Summary of the above provisions for applicablity
Supplier Type Micro Small Medium
Manufacturer Yes Yes No
Service Provider Yes Yes No
Trader No No No
Provisions of section 15 of the MSME Act

Chapter- V, section 15 of the MSME Act provides that the payments to micro or small enterprises must be made as per the agreement or the appointed day. However, in no case such credit period whether agreed or otherwise may exceed 45 days from the date of acceptance/ deemed acceptance.

Appointed day- Day immediately following the expiry of 15 days from the date of acceptance. (section 2(h) of the MSME Act.)

  1. https://www.dcmsme.gov.in/scan0052.pdf
  2. https://samadhaan.msme.gov.in/WriteReadData/DocumentFile/MSMED2006act.pdf

Date of acceptance - date of actual delivery of goods or service, or where there has been an objection with respect to acceptance of delivery, date of removal of such objection by the supplier.

Date of deemed acceptance - where no objections are filed by the buyer within 15 days of delivery of good/ services, the date of delivery of good/ services would be deemed to be the date of acceptance

Therefore it may be noted that where there is no agreement, the time limit allowed for making the payment due is 15 days from the date of acceptance also called as Appointed day.In case of an agreement, if the agreement prescribes a shorter duration or a duration which is less than 45 days, then the date as prescribed in the agreement. Where the agreement provides for a credit period longer than 45 days, then the credit period would be restricted to 45 days and the payment would accordingly fall due on the 46th day.

Position of applicability of section 43B(h) of the Act under various scenarios
Sr. No. Particulars of Payment Whether 43B(h) applies Remarks
1 Payment made within time limit prescribed under MSME Act NO Expenditure allowed. Expenditure allowed in same FY i.e. year of accrual
2 Payment not made within time limit but paid before the end of FY No Though payment is made beyond the time limit prescribed but as the payment is made before end of FY, the deduction would be allowed in the same FY
3 Expense accrued towards the end of march falling due in April as per provisions of MSME Act, and payment made in April within the time limit allowed under MSME No Since payment is made within the time limit allowed, applying principle of accrual basis, the deduction would be allowed in the year of accrual. 43B would not apply
4 Expense accrued towards the end of march falling due in April as per provisions of MSME Act, but payment beyond the time limit allowed under MSME eg. May of next FY Yes Deduction would be allowed in the year of payment i.e. in next FY
How to verify whether the Vendor is a MSE's supplier?

Usually, after the amendment, the suppliers include their MSE registration number on the invoice or alternatively acquire a declaration or copy of certificate from the vendor. Further, the buyers can verify the registration and the type of enterprise (Micro/ Small/ Medium) using the registration number from the MSME portal.

What if the Supplier does not intimate the MSE registration to the Buyer?

The buyer may ask for the details of registration in discharge of his responsibility in good faith. However, it is the duty of the supplier to intimate the fact of his registration as an MSE to the buyer. If the supplier fails to intimate the details and fact of his registration as an MSE, the buyer cannot be expected to be bound by the provisions of section 43B(h).

Position where the supplier is both a supplier and trader?

In such cases, a position may be taken to make 43B(h) apply only to supplies. However, as a matter of abundance caution, one may comply with making such payments to the supplier both in respect of trading and supply activity within the stipulated time in case the expenses include a mix of both.

Position of provisions created for various expenses

Usually, following the accrual concept principle, the Assessee's usually create provision for expenses on the last date of the Accounting year for various service such as audit fee, legal fee etc. In such a scenario, the provisions of section 43B(h) may not apply as provisions of section 15 of the Act, require the Assessee to make payment to the micro or small enterprise within 15 days from the delivery of goods/ provisioning of services. Therefore, one may say that as on the date of creation of such provision, the time limit for payment has not lapsed and therefore provisions of section 43B(h) do not apply.

Whether the provisions apply to unpaid GST?

Input GST is usually claimed as an ITC and therefore not debited/ charged to the profit and account. Hence the question of applicability of 43B(h) of the Act in such scenario would not arise.

However, in case of ineligible ITC or blocked credit, the same is charged to P&L account as an expense. Since the buyer has the liability to pay the same to the supplier in discharge of the invoice raised, it may be argued that such ineligible ITC would be allowed to be debited only on actual payment basis.

Position of applicability of 43B(h) of the Act on outstanding balances as on 31.03.2023

Section 43B of the Act applies to expenses which have been claimed as deductions during the year but remain unpaid. Carry forward balances do not represent any deductions claimed during the year. Therefore the provisions of section 43B do not apply in such a scenario.

Other Key Considerations
  1. Mandatory liability of interest to MSE

    Further, as per section 16 of the MSME Act, a mandatory charge of interest comes into play. Interest liability is therefore a statutory obligation rather than optional. Section 16 provides for pay compound interest being charged at monthly rests interest will be calculated on the closing balance of the previous month to the supplier at three times of bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank for the period of delay.

  2. Disallowance of interest paid / payable to MSE forever

    Section 23 of the MSME Act provides that any interest paid to micro or small enterprise on account of late payment would not be eligible for deduction under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Unlike provisions of Section 43B(h) of the Act which provides for deduction of expenditure on actual payment basis, section 23 of the MSME Act, disallows interest paid on delayed payment permanently.

  3. Applicability of section 43B(h) on TDS component of expenditure

    Further, in authors view, the amount disallowed u/s 43B(h) of the Act would be the amount net of TDS, where the buyer has deducted and deposited the TDS on behalf of the supplier to the Government even though the buyer has not discharged his balance dues to the supplier. The logical reasoning is that, the supplier can avail the benefit of this TDS as it would appear in his form 26AS.

    Eg. - if A availed consultancy services from B in the month of Feb 2024 for which B charged A Rs. 2,00,000/- (GST ignored for the sake of convenience). In this case A debits his P&L for consultancy services with Rs. 2,00,000/-. Further A is liable to deduct TDS u/s 194J @ 10% at the time of accrual or payment whichever is earlier on or before 7th March 2024. If A has deducted and deposited Rs. 20,000/- with government but did not pay the balance amount to the supplier, then the net amount to be disallowed u/s 43B(h) would be Rs. 1,80,000/- as 20,000/- has already been deducted and paid to on behalf of the supplier to the government.

  4. Provisions of section 43B(h) do not affect Assessee's / buyers who opt for presumptive taxation u/s 44AD/ 44ADA of the Act.
Disclaimer-

The views expressed are the opinion of the author and may differ from others.

 
     
12389 Times Visited