IMPACT OF LATE PAYMENT TO MSME VENDORS -
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SECTION 43B(h) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961
Introduction
The Government vide Finance Act, 2023 introduced clause 'h' to section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the
Ac') to the statute books with an intent to protect the interest and mitigate the hardships of the micro and
small size enterprises (MSE) from default in payment of their dues. The insertion of newly inserted clause 'h'
to section 43B of the Act would mean that the deduction with respect to any sum payable by the Assessee to any
MSE beyond the time limit specified in section 15 of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act,
2006 (MSME Act) would be allowed only on payment basis.
Therefore, understanding of the definition of MSE, provisions of section 43B(h) under various scenarios that
may call for disallowance, and provisions of section 15 of the MSME Act therefore acquire relevance for a
better understanding of the tax consequences
Who qualify to be a micro or a small enterprise?
Notification no. S.O. 2119 (E) dated 26.06.2020 , section 2(h) and 2(m) r.w. section 7 of the MSME Act
prescribes the following criteria for micro or small enterprise which must be cumulatively satisfied -
Sr. No |
Condition/ criteria |
Micro enterprise |
Small enterprise |
1 |
Investment in P&M (good) or equipment (services) |
Upto Rs. 1 crore |
above Rs. 1 crore upto Rs. 10 crore |
AND |
2 |
Turnover |
Upto 5 crore |
Above Rs. 5 crore upto Rs. 50 crore |
It is clarified by Explanation 1 to the 7(1) of MSME Act that in calculating the investment in plant and
machinery, the cost of pollution control, research and development, industrial safety devices and such other
items as may be specified, by notification, shall be excluded.
Apart from the above, the enterprise meeting such criteria must have obtained an Udyam registration from a
competent authority under the provisions of section 2(n) r.w.s 8 of the MSME Act to be eligible for
recognition as a MSE.
Therefore, in absence of such registration, applicability of provisions of section 43B(h) may not arise to
payments due to such vendors.
- https://incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx
- https://dcmsme.gov.in/State-Gov/Notification_%20S%20O%202119.pdf
Position of payment made to medium enterprises
Your attention may be invited that the word 'medium enterprise is missing' from the provisions of section
43B(h) and section 15, therefore suggesting that sums payable to medium enterprises do not get covered under
the sweep of section 43B(h) of the Act.
Position of payment made to pure traders
Furthermore, section 2(e) of the MSME Act defines an enterprise to be industrial undertaking or business or
any other mode of establishment which is engaged in the manufacture or production of goods pertaining
to industry mentioned in the First Schedule of the Industries development and regulations Act, 1951 or engaged
in providing or rendering of any services.
Further, The Central Government , vide office memorandum(O.M) issued on 2-7-2021 , has allowed the
TRADERS to
get registration for UDYAM under the NIC Code 45,46 and 47 but for limited purposes. In that O. M. it is
specifically stated that benefit to retail and wholesale trader MSME shall be restricted only for Priority
Sector Lending.
Accordingly, one may consider that payment made to pure traders of goods do not get covered by the provisions
of section 43B(h) of the Act though they would have acquired a UDYAM registration for banking purposes.
Summary of the above provisions for applicablity
Supplier Type |
Micro |
Small |
Medium |
Manufacturer |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Service Provider |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Trader |
No |
No |
No |
Provisions of section 15 of the MSME Act
Chapter- V, section 15 of the MSME Act provides that the payments to micro or small enterprises must
be made as per the agreement or the appointed day. However, in no case such credit period whether agreed or
otherwise may exceed 45 days from the date of acceptance/ deemed acceptance.
Appointed day- Day immediately following the expiry of 15 days from the date of acceptance. (section
2(h) of the MSME Act.)
- https://www.dcmsme.gov.in/scan0052.pdf
- https://samadhaan.msme.gov.in/WriteReadData/DocumentFile/MSMED2006act.pdf
Date of acceptance - date of actual delivery of goods or service, or where there has been an objection
with
respect to acceptance of delivery, date of removal of such objection by the supplier.
Date of deemed acceptance - where no objections are filed by the buyer within 15 days of
delivery of good/ services, the date of delivery of good/ services would be deemed to be the date of
acceptance
Therefore it may be noted that where there is no agreement, the time limit allowed for making the payment
due is 15 days from the date of acceptance also called as Appointed day.In case of an agreement, if the
agreement prescribes a shorter duration or a duration which is less than 45 days, then the date as prescribed
in the agreement. Where the agreement provides for a credit period longer than 45 days, then the credit period
would be restricted to 45 days and the payment would accordingly fall due on the 46th day.
Position of applicability of section 43B(h) of the Act under various scenarios
Sr. No. |
Particulars of Payment |
Whether 43B(h) applies |
Remarks |
1 |
Payment made within time limit prescribed under MSME Act |
NO |
Expenditure allowed. Expenditure allowed in same FY i.e. year of accrual |
2 |
Payment not made within time limit but paid before the end of FY |
No |
Though payment is made beyond the time limit prescribed but as the payment is made before end of FY, the
deduction would be allowed in the same FY |
3 |
Expense accrued towards the end of march falling due in April as per provisions of MSME Act, and payment
made in April within the time limit allowed under MSME |
No |
Since payment is made within the time limit allowed, applying principle of accrual basis, the deduction
would be allowed in the year of accrual. 43B would not apply |
4 |
Expense accrued towards the end of march falling due in April as per provisions of MSME Act, but payment
beyond the time limit allowed under MSME eg. May of next FY |
Yes |
Deduction would be allowed in the year of payment i.e. in next FY |
How to verify whether the Vendor is a MSE's supplier?
Usually, after the amendment, the suppliers include their MSE registration number on the invoice or
alternatively acquire a declaration or copy of certificate from the vendor. Further, the buyers can verify the
registration and the type of enterprise (Micro/ Small/ Medium) using the registration number from the MSME
portal.
What if the Supplier does not intimate the MSE registration to the Buyer?
The buyer may ask for the details of registration in discharge of his responsibility in good faith. However,
it is the duty of the supplier to intimate the fact of his registration as an MSE to the buyer. If the
supplier fails to intimate the details and fact of his registration as an MSE, the buyer cannot be expected to
be bound by the provisions of section 43B(h).
Position where the supplier is both a supplier and trader?
In such cases, a position may be taken to make 43B(h) apply only to supplies. However, as a matter of
abundance caution, one may comply with making such payments to the supplier both in respect of trading and
supply activity within the stipulated time in case the expenses include a mix of both.
Position of provisions created for various expenses
Usually, following the accrual concept principle, the Assessee's usually create provision for expenses on the
last date of the Accounting year for various service such as audit fee, legal fee etc. In such a scenario, the
provisions of section 43B(h) may not apply as provisions of section 15 of the Act, require the Assessee to
make payment to the micro or small enterprise within 15 days from the delivery of goods/ provisioning of
services. Therefore, one may say that as on the date of creation of such provision, the time limit for payment
has not lapsed and therefore provisions of section 43B(h) do not apply.
Whether the provisions apply to unpaid GST?
Input GST is usually claimed as an ITC and therefore not debited/ charged to the profit and account. Hence
the question of applicability of 43B(h) of the Act in such scenario would not arise.
However, in case of ineligible ITC or blocked credit, the same is charged to P&L account as an expense.
Since the buyer has the liability to pay the same to the supplier in discharge of the invoice raised, it may
be
argued that such ineligible ITC would be allowed to be debited only on actual payment basis.
Section 43B of the Act applies to expenses which have been claimed as deductions during the year but remain
unpaid. Carry forward balances do not represent any deductions claimed during the year. Therefore the provisions
of section 43B do not apply in such a scenario.
The views expressed are the opinion of the author and may differ from others.